Friday, September 30, 2011
Iran's Atomic Ayatollah, Missile-Mad Mullahs and their
Maniac-in-Chief Escalate War on Christian Community
Iran's Christian community urgently needs Western help, as reported here.
But the Western world's leaders, including U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama, are really not inclined to come to the aid of non-Muslims. Obama is bent on appeasing and aligning with "the Muslim world." His administration aims to end what remains of the war against radical Islam by decimating Al Qaeda and declaring victory over "violent extremism." With the exception of AQ, practically all other Islamist groups and entities, including the Taliban, are considered alright to engage (appease and align with) by the Obama administration. Obama proved this when he tried to strike a Grand Bargain with nuclear-arming Iran. After failing miserably--appeasement is making war with North Korea's Nazi-like partner in proliferation inevitable--BHO turned to Turkey, hailing it as a model "Islamic democracy," encouraging its imperialist foreign policy, which increasingly threatens Israel and Greece.
Put differently, it is as if in reaching out to rightwing political Islam and overlapping organized and state Islam, America's first Muslim-born-and-reared President is saying to the world's estimated 1.5 billion Muslims: We understand you and your grievances, the root causes of the terrorism and violence with which you and your lands have tragically become associated. Because we understand you, we want to work with you, help you to achieve your goals and ambitions--as long as you don't attack us physically, the way your lunatic fringe did on 9/11. In other words, you can build bombs. But don't use them against us. You can overthrow your dictators, even if they are our friends and allies, and loot (I should say liberate) the arsenals of your armed forces. And you can sell the weapons, like Libya's missing heat-seeking missiles. But don't use these things to shoot down our airplanes. That just isn't acceptable. We won't stand for it.
But that doesn't mean that you can't force your women to wear barbaric burqas and veils and ugly headscarves. Yes you can! You can even beat them if they step out of line or violate your medieval rules and customs--like driving a car in Saudi Arabia, a country with no human or civil rights, ruled by a tyrant before whom I myself bowed, from the waist, deeply and submissively, like a slave or a servant. We have no problem with any of that ... as long as you don't blow us up.
More important, you can go on brainwashing and indoctrinating your boys and young men in your backward schools and seminaries, and you can even establish similarly backward institutions of rote learning, hatred and bigotry here in the United States, where your lawyers and activists can use our own democracy and legal system and traditions of tolerance and pluralism--and our obsession with diversity for its own sake--against us, in order to carve out separate spaces, establish special rights and privileges, impose your religious law as the law of our land. I have no problem with any of that. Nor do most liberal and progressive Americans. We welcome your ways, promise never to pass judgement on them. In this regard, we are and always will be sensitive to your needs, for we appreciate your power--provided, again, that you use it peacefully, even in pursuit of our ultimate defeat.
In other words, while brainwashing in the name of Islam is OK, beheadings are not--at least, not in the United States of America.
Overseas is a different matter altogether. Cultural contexts vary from country to country, region to region. We understand this all too well after all the terrible mistakes we have made, the atrocities and war crimes that my predecessors have committed in the name of democracy--and for which I have already apologized to you in the past and will continue to apologize for as long as I am in the White House. Beheadings are traditionally carried out with swords. And that may seem harsh to many Americans. But know this: more and more Americans have come to realize that the sword of Islam is a just and righteous sword--and an essentially progressive sword. Guided by this understanding, we want Islamic democracies to expand across the Middle East and the Arab world, including Libya, which is geographically in Africa but culturally part of the Middle East, and into Central Asia. We look forward to this expansion, will help you in every possible way, stand with you even against other great powers that may seek to oppress you.
You see, we progressive Americans, and I proudly include myself among them, believe that your movement deserves to succeed, for yours is the right side of history. The Arc of Islam corresponds to the Moral Arc of History, an arc that will soon spread from Africa to China.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Has Republican Presidential hopeful Michelle Bachmann been reading Foreign Confidential? Seems she has, because her comments regarding Obama and the so-called Arab Spring--and Carter and Iran's Islamic Revolution--are in sync and spot on. Click here for the story.
The Obama administration is worried about Egypt.
Having helped to overthrow Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, the administration now fears that it may have assisted in the creation of another Iran (just as Carter administration aided the Islamist takeover of that country, which was a friend of Israel and a staunch ally of the United States until the ouster of its modernizing monarch, Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi).
Click here to read the report from AP via Fox News on the meeting in Washington between U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Kamel Amr.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Israel at a glance on the eve of Rosh Hashanah. Click here for the story.
Is this How Iran and North Korea
Plan to Destroy the United States?
EMP: the Attack that Could End the US
Containerized Missile System: from Russia with Hate
Concealed Ship-Based Ballistic Missile Firing
System for Surface, Underwater, Land Targets
IRAN THREATENS US ATLANTIC COAST,
Weakness invites aggression.
The nuclear-arming, Nazi-like regime that U.S. President Barack Obama tried to engage (appease and align with) is threatening the United States in an unprecedented way. Click on the above headline.
Iran's threat to to send warships into the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico echoes Turkey's threat to send its warships into the Eastern Mediterranean to challenge Israel.
The U.S. is certainly capable of defending itself against Iran's Navy. But there is no known defense against a cargo ship-or-barge-based ballistic missile attack on U.S. coastal cities or an EMP attack from such a seemingly civilian vessel.
Iran and nuclear-armed North Korea are believed to have collaborated in developing and test-firing missiles from containerized launchers concealed aboard cargo ships, thousand of which, flying flags of convenience, approach U.S. waters every day.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Radical Islam in Action: Immigrant Muslim Poet Who Expressed Love for the Jewish People Viciously Attacked on US City Street
Sharia Vigilantes in St. Louis, Missouri ...
NEO-OTTOMAN SULTAN LAUNCHES WARSHIP
What Condoleezza Rice (Bush was clueless) and Barack Obama wrought: imperialist, Islamist Turkey, a full NATO member poised to roam the Mediterranean like some sort of sea monster as it plots and plans Israel's destruction. Rice persuaded Bush to back Turkey's "moderate Islamist regime" against the country's traditional guardian of its secular system--the military--which was ready, willing and able to crush the clerical fascist scum when that kind of action was still a realistic option. Obama escalated the pro-Islamist policy to outright backing for a neo-Ottoman empire as a counter to nuclear-arming Iran, having failed miserably in his perfidious pursuit of a Grand Bargain with the turbaned tyranny.
Immigrants Target Swiss Flag for 'Change'
This American Jewish Reporter Says: Keep the Cross!
Heaven Help Humanity if it's Replaced by a Crescent!
Foreign Confidential™ analysts assert U.S. President Barack Obama, should a mainstream media reporter dare to press him for a reaction to the insane Swiss flag issue, would signal a newsworthy measure of sympathy for the multicultural (code for Islamist/Muslim fundamentalist) activists. His outrageous intervention in France's burqa ban controversy--on the side of organizations insisting on a "right" to wear Islamic veils and headscarves--set a precedent with regard to Presidential pro-Muslim meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries. AP reported on June 22, 2009:
In a visit to Normandy earlier this month, President Barack Obama addressed France's headscarf ban, saying countries handle such issues with their national sensitivities and histories in mind, before adding: "I will tell you that in the United States our basic attitude is, is that we're not going to tell people what to wear."
Nightmare in NATO's new Libya--what Barack Obama, Samantha Power, and Hillary Clinton have wrought in the name of protecting civilians and promoting democracy. Click here to read all about the missing missiles that are almost certain to end up in the hands of Islamist monsters bent on downing U.S. military and civilian aircraft.
How can any American who cares about national security even think of voting for Obama?
How can any American Jew who cares about national security, Israel's survival and the survival of the Jewish people even think about voting for Obama?
JEWISH DEPUTY MAYOR OF PARIS SUBURB
Related Archived Articles:
Iran Ordeal Account by Two Freed American Hikers Vindicates Foreign Confidential™ Use of Hostage Term
The freed Americans are speaking out, loudly and clearly, about their hostage ordeal in Islamist (clerical fascist) Iran. Click here for the story.
Foreign Confidential™ was one of the very few media outlets to use the term hostages to describe the innocent hikers held by Iran. Click here for an example.
Use of the hostage term triggered criticism from liberal Idiots of Appeasement and leftwing apologists for the monstrous mullahocracy.
Which nowadays is to be expected.
Unfortunately, the former hostages are showing signs of suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and a case of severe, possibly incurable, leftwing/liberal lunacy, as reported here.
Monday, September 26, 2011
2007 ATTACK BY PAKISTAN WAS RETALIATION
Pakistan has long been America's enemy. But the Islamic state, which practically invented the Taliban--and aided Al Qaeda before and after 9/11--has nuclear weapons.
Pakistan is also supported by Saudi Arabia, which is worried that increasing awareness of Pakistani treachery will lead to greater awareness of Saudi treachery.
Foreign Confidential™ has learned that Syria's secular Assad regime is increasingly concerned that its Shiite Islamist ally, Iran, believing Assad's days are numbered, intends to collaborate in Syria's dismemberment in order to create an Iranian Alawite satellite in the center of the country. An Alawite state existed after World War I in French Mandate Syria.
Considered a branch of Shiite Islam, the Alawites are a distinct minority in Syria that has ruled the country since 1970, when then-Air Force General Hafez al-Assad, an Alawite, took power and instigated a "Correctionist Movement" in the Ba'ath Party. After the death of Hafez al-Assad in 2000, his son, Bashar, took power.
Iran is at odds with the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood that commands growing support among the country's Sunni population, which represents about 76% of Syrian citizens. Though Shiite and Sunni Islamists agree on hatred of the United States and Israel, the movements are rivals, competing for power and influence across the Middle East.
Turkey's Sunni Islamist regime is also interested in a Syrian breakup. A Kurdish puppet state in northern Syria would serve Turkish interests as it pursues a neo-Ottoman imperialist foreign policy--with the support of the Obama administration, which wants to use Turkey, a full NATO member, as a counter to nuclear-arming Iran.
By Elias Bejjani
A little knowledge that acts is worth infinitely more than much knowledge that is idle. -Kahlil Gibran
Both Logic and reality tell us that not even one sane person can dream that a meek sheep can fight a lion or even defend himself in a bid not to be devoured. This very simple fact is totally ignored by the Free World and the majority of the Arab countries when occupied Lebanon's dilemma is the issue. The whole world knows with no shed of doubt that Lebanon is still an occupied country and that the occupiers are Syria, Iran and their proxy armed terrorist militias, with Hezbollah in the forefront.
In 2005, Syria was forced to withdraw her occupational army from Lebanon after 28 years of barbaric oppression and inhuman atrocities against all the Lebanese people. But since then, nothing really has positively changed with regard to reclaiming independence and sovereignty by the Lebanese authorities. On the contrary, everything on all levels and in all domains has been getting worse and worse. In reality, the whole country, her ruling bodies, officials and people have all been hijacked and are being held as hostages.
Syria Dissected Lebanon
During the era of its occupation, Syria evilly dissected Lebanon, divided its multicultural communities, killed, imprisoned or sent into exile all patriotic leaders and intellectuals who opposed its ironic and criminal hegemony. At the same time, Syria’s secret intelligence services armed the 13 Palestinian refugee camps and made them outlaw-Mafiosi mini-states. In conjunction with the Iranian mullahs, Syria erected Hezbollah's mini-state and armed its militia with a huge and deadly arsenal that became not only a threat to the Lebanese, but also to all the Arab and Middle East countries.
Hezbollah's 70.000 thousand full time armed (mujahedeen) men took over Lebanon after Syria was forced to withdraw her army, while thousands of Syrian secret intelligence service agents remained free and active all over the country. Meanwhile, Syria left intact four military bases under the camouflaged pretext of Palestinian resistance, one of them (Al Naemi base) is a few kilometers from Beirut international Airport.
The majority of the Lebanese people (from all denominations) who kindled the torch of the Cedars' Revolution won two parliamentary elections since 2005, but could not rule or put into office a free president, house speaker, army chief or any high-ranking official because Syria and Iran through their armed proxies aborted all peaceful and democratic endeavors, and militarily invaded and controlled most of the Lebanese regions. In last January, Hezbollah toppled the coalition government by force and intimidation and formed its own, while the whole world carelessly watched and did nothing besides empty rhetorical releases and statements of condemnation.
World's Most Effective Terrorists
The irony lies in the fact that the U.S. government has labeled Hezbollah, in its State Department report of 2008, as the world's most effective terrorist organization. The report said that Iran remains the most active state sponsor of terrorism, including supporting terrorist groups such as Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. According to the same report, "Iran's involvement in the planning and financial support of terrorist attacks throughout the Middle East, Europe and Central Asia had a direct impact on international efforts to promote peace, threatened economic stability in the Gulf, and undermined the growth of democracy". It singled out the Qods Force, an elite branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as the Islamic republic's main means to cultivate and support terrorists overseas. The Qods Force gave "weapons, training and funding" to Hamas and other Palestinian anti-Israeli groups, Lebanon's Hezbollah, as well as Iraq-based militants and Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.
One wonders how can the United States, the mightiest military and financial power in the whole world, officially recognizes the serious and great dangers of Iran and its terrorist proxy, Hezbollah, while expecting the Lebanese people and their patriotic leaders and parties to tame, control, disarm this terrorist organization and reclaim alone their country’s confiscated independence?
It is worth mentioning that Hezbollah from day one of its creation by Iran in 1982 and up until now has been a serious and deadly threat to all the civilized and Free World countries. As such, it is not merely Lebanese problem, but rather a serious problem, grave threat and challenge to global peace, stability and democracy. Hezbollah's essence and spiritual, cultural and political foundation are totally derived from the Iranian mullah's doctrine of “Wilayat Al-Faqih”.
The main pillars of this doctrine are zero tolerance for all others who are of different faiths and cultures and who do not fully submit to their control. It is a blatant rejection of the civil, democratic and free societies; a systematic, tireless effort to export the "Wilayat Al-Faqih", and impose it on the whole world through "Jihad" (holy war), deeply rooted hatred for the Western democracies and cultures, staunch enmity and hostility towards the US and Israel, all with a suicidal mentality. One of its prime aims is to destroy Israel and ‘liberate’ the Holy city of Jerusalem.
Therefore, Hezbollah is an Iranian militant organization on all levels and by every definition. Its Iranian mission, terrorist activities and objectives have become crystal clear, not only to the Lebanese people who are suffering on a daily basis from its oppression, intimidation and dictatorship, but also to the majority of the Arab states, U.S., Canada and Australia. This intimidation, fear mongering and illicit fundraising activities also extend to many European, African and South American countries.
Hezbollah has nothing to do with resistance, liberation or any actual patriotic Lebanese or Arabic causes by any means. In reality, Hezbollah is an Iranian militant brigade, a division of Iran's notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC).
According to dozens of well documented and trustworthy reports, Hezbollah continues to run a vast, well organized and extremely sophisticated global network of drug trafficking, crime, terrorism and arms trafficking, infiltrating many Arab states, Israel, Mexico, Canada, Australia, United States, Europe, South America and numerous previous Islamic states of the USSR.
Since 1982, Hezbollah has systematically been devouring the state of Lebanon, destroying her military, judicial and financial institutions, crippling her legislature and democratic government and fragmenting and terrorizing her delicate social fabric, all the while solidifying the terrorist infrastructure and Iranian-modeled institutions of its mini-state and scattered cantons.
What is unfortunate and shameful, is that the Free World and surrounding Arab countries, are not showing enough determination, transparency, seriousness or persistence in dealing with Hezbollah. the most dangerous terrorist organization in the whole world, while they openly admit that Hezbollah and its Iranian masters are taking a very active criminal role in killing the Syrian and Iranian people who are revolting against the al-Assad and the Iranian mullahs’ dictatorial regimes.
In conclusion, Lebanon is an occupied country by all international means and legal criteria. The occupiers are the two Axis of Evil countries, Syria and Iran, with their armed proxies spearheaded by the terrorist Hezbollah. Simply and openly we strongly believe that the Lebanese people are not any more capable of freeing their country on their own while all the governing bodies and officials do not represent them but the occupiers. In this context, it is time for the Free World and Arab countries to courageously step in directly or through the UN and do something about this barbaric occupation and use all their available resources including force to free Lebanon and end its people’s oppression.
Elias Bejjani is a Canadian-Lebanese Human Rights activist, journalist and political commentator.
Republicans are rightfully riled up about the Solyndra scam. But they are painting with too broad a brush, assuming they want (a) to take back the White House in 2012, and (b) to save the country from permanent recession or outright economic collapse. In this regard, the problem isn't government support for energy startups; rather, the problem is government support, including mandates, grants and loans, tax credits and other incentives, for phony energy startups.
Imagine if $1 billion in venture capital and $500 million in loans had gone into a well thought-out, well managed, domestic oil industry startup--a company dedicated, say, to discovering new onshore oil fields and to squeezing new oil from old onshore fields through commercially proven, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods. The United States sits atop enough economically recoverable onshore oil to make the dream of energy independence a reality while directly and indirectly producing millions of well paying, permanent jobs (with health and medical benefits). Google EOR, heavy oil, unconventional oil, Bakken oil discovery, etc.
The problem, which Republicans should not be reluctant to discuss honestly, is that for the most part these awesome, economically recoverable resources are not economical enough--can't be produced profitably enough--for multinational energy behemoths that for many reasons are focused on finding and producing giant oil and gas fields in Third World jurisdictions. So the revival of the U.S. independent oil and gas industry should be a major priority.
Even with regard to green energy, there is a difference between phony and real alternatives, inefficient and efficient solutions, existing and nonexistent sources. For example, while cellulosic biofuels are at best a boondoggle and at worst a fraud--forever "just around the corner" or supposedly only two years away from commercialization--woody biomass can be economically burned and torrefied (turned into a coal-like fuel) today for electricity-generating and combined heat and power (CHP), or co-generation, applications. Commercially converting perennially growing, warm season prairie grasses into gasoline is a distant dream; but burning these grasses--unlocking the thermal energy--dates back to the pioneering days. More to the point, large European companies, including utilities, are deeply involved in successful biomass utilization--from electricity generation to CHP for local use and district heating. (The Department of Energy has in the past inexplicably warned grant applicants against any mention of thermal biomass. Researchers have actually feared blacklisting if they seek federal funds in order to solve, say, certain technical problems plaguing wider use of grass energy pellets instead of trying to suck still more government money down into the cellulosic sinkhole.)
In short, America's real wealth is in the ground. Getting at that wealth--discovering and developing it--will require government backing in one form or another. Republicans should be all for that, exposing the energy-choking, job-killing policies of the Democrats.
Republicans should be pushing policies that will lead to the creation of big, new, publicly traded companies that will be exclusively dedicated to producing power and fuel--and jobs--in the United States. A side benefit to the Republicans would be the creation of a new American establishment--a new group of natural resource-based, billionaire entrepreneurs--who will have made their fortunes the old fashioned way--but with a modern, populist twist--namely, through the enlightened exploitation of the nation's true economic treasure. These men and women would most likely be Republicans and could constitute a much-needed counterweight to the globalizing, Left/liberal billionaires who hail from Hollywood and Silicon Valley.
POSTSCRIPT: The oil industry's dirty little secret is that nobody of importance in Big Oil really believes in the Big Lie that the world is running out of oil; on the contrary, those in the know well know that the world is running into oil, only it's the wrong kind of oil from the perspective of the multinational energy giants--meaning, oil that is harder and more costly to produce (e.g. EOR and deep, offshore oil) and perhaps also more costly to refine (e.g. heavy crude and tars sands).
What's happening in oil is true of all natural resources--a transition from relatively scarce resources that can be inexpensively produced to far more plentiful but harder to produce--and hence more costly--resources. Big Oil wants to manage the shift, phase in production of the costlier resources as they become more profitable and attractive over time; therefore, supporting the Big Lie that the world is about to run out of oil serves the interests of Big Oil.
The same holds true for Big Oil support for another Big Lie--manmade global warming. Big Oil plays along with the mind boggling branding of life-giving carbon dioxide as a planet-destroying pollutant--down to the deliberately deceptive use and popularizing of the term carbon, which is meant to connote and conjure up images in people's minds of industrial filth and toxic waste--because it helps to distract the public from demanding development of domestic, here-and-now, real energy resources, preempts calls for government policies aimed at encouraging this and/or creation of a national oil company tasked with such development, or, over on the Left, possible emergence of a movement to nationalize (essentially unpatriotic) Big Oil.
Since the whole world runs on oil and will continue to run on oil for at least the next two decades, Big Oil has potentially little to lose and a lot to gain by conceding the faux carbon-climate change connection, appearing to accept the validity of the "fossil fuels" menace.
Ditto for the occasional institutional ads and TV commercials that show Big Oil investing in never-to-be-commercially available cellulosic biofuels and in available but geographically limited and inefficient solar and wind--seriously flawed, electricity-generating alternatives that by definition do not threaten the business of producing, refining, moving and marketing liquid fuels for motor transportation and commercial, industrial, and residential heating.
Somewhat similarly, oil-rich, Islamist Iran promotes the world-is-running-out-of-oil myth because it helps to justify the Iranian regime's investment in civilian nuclear power, which even many, if not most, Idiots of Appeasement now agree merely masks the development of nuclear weapons.
But that's another story.
Copyright © 2011 Foreign Confidential™
TWO TEENAGE MONKS COMMIT SUICIDE
A terrible waste of human life. Click on the above headline to read all about it. At least, they didn't kill others. But click here to read a pro-"Palestine" screed by a viciously anti-Israel Tibetan separatist who is clearly sympathetic to Islamist suicide bombers.
Which isn't surprising considering the Dalai Lama's feudal past and history of befriending and associating with Nazis.
Click here for his criticism of those who say Islam is inherently violent.
Key questions: Was the Dalai Lama aware of the suicide pact? Did he make any effort to stop it? Will he now speak out forcefully against self-immolation in the name of religion?
Related Archived Article: No Shangri-La: Life in Old Tibet
POSTSCRIPT: Historically, with respect to U.S. foreign policy, covert U.S. government support for Tibetan separatism and feudalism paralleled covert U.S. government support for rightwing political Islam and covert U.S. government collaboration with Nazis and Nazi collaborators after World War II.
The shameful, ends-justify-means policies have all produced blowbacks of one kind or another. U.S. support for Tibetan separatism is an obstacle to teaming with China against a common enemy--radical Islam--especially in light of U.S. aid, also, to Muslim Uighur separatists. Postwar U.S. backing of Nazis and Nazi collaborators led to a clandestine, counterproductive rollback campaign against the Soviet Union, conducted under cover of an overt containment policy--a failed, secret war of liberation that contributed to a worsening of U.S.-Soviet relations while allowing thousands of Nazi war criminals to escape prosecution and many Nazis to enter the United States and become leaders and active members of anti-Semitic, racist, radical rightwing organizations that influenced U.S. foreign policy and defense planning to a shocking degree. Secret U.S. support for rightwing political Islam blew back in the Islamist-led overthrow of Iran's pro-American, modernizing monarch, Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi; the Islamist assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat; and the unleashing of the global jihad as a result of the incredibly costly, covert U.S. intervention in Afghanistan--which led to the Islamist mega-terror attacks of September 11, 2001. Next to come: blowback from covert and overt U.S. support for the so-called Arab Spring and rising Turkey's "Islamist-inspired" regime ... and Iran's emergence as a nuclear weapons state capable of threatening Israel, Europe, and the U.S. itself (barring a miraculous revolution or coup in Iran or an 11th-hour attack by the U.S. and/or Israel on Iran's nuclear and missile installations). Nuclear-arming, Islamist Iran and its partner in proliferation, nuclear-armed, Communist/Kimist North Korea, are capable of creating the ultimate, unthinkable blowback for the U.S. and its allies.
HELP WANTED: A truly progressive, pro-labor, pro-middle class Republican Presidential candidate with the courage, common sense, intelligence and skill to defeat Barack Obama and the fawning liberal media through class warfare jujitsu--specifically, advocacy of government mandates and incentives aimed at aggressively developing America's awesome natural resources and rebuilding America's deliberately hollowed-out manufacturing sector. Candidate must be persuasive and passionate about mining, manufacturing, drilling for oil and gas and other resources in the United States in order to create millions of well paying, permanent jobs. Candidate must also be ready, willing and able to mobilize mass support among independent and disaffected Democratic voters by formulating and proposing and clearly and convincingly articulating need for government policies that will encourage and reward companies that invest in manufacturing and resource production at home and penalize resource and manufacturing firms that make most of their money overseas and refuse to reinvest it in the USA. Ideal candidate should have a proven track record in environmental protection and conservation and demonstrated, genuine appreciation for America's natural beauty.
Sunday, September 25, 2011
No end to the appeasement....
Iran-backed foreign terrorist commander, a creature responsible for killing Americans, may get a trial, albeit a military tribunal, on American soil. Click here for the story.
Why is this person alive in the first place?
Islamist Afghan Scum Who Attacked US Embassy in Kabul Were US Allies Against USSR, Considered 'Goodness Personified' by Pro-Islamist Idiot Congressman
Click here to read about the horrible Haqqanis, whose aging leader--who was a friend of the late U.S. Congressman Charlie Wilson and an ally and protector of Osama Bin Laden--is believed to have once met with President Ronald Reagan at the White House.
Ignore the dumb or deliberately deceiving comparison in the article's lead sentence to the fictional Soprano crime family. The mafia analogy is meant to emphasize the Machiavellian angle while downplaying the ideological dimension--the role that rightwing political Islam, or Islamism, plays in the story and in U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, Central Asia and across the Arab world (e.g. Libya). The article speaks volumes about the cynical, stupid policy of arming and funding the worst scum on earth (apart from the North Korean regime) in order to manipulate and exploit Islamism, a form of clerical fascism, commonly called radical Islam, which threatens all of civilized humanity.
Republicans and Democrats alike supported the shameful U.S. intervention in Afghanistan on the side of Afghan Islamists and drug-dealing warlords. In fact, the U.S. intervention, which was aimed at rolling back and hastening the collapse of the Soviet Union, began under President Jimmy Carter. The Afghan adventure was the brainchild of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. Reagan expanded the intervention into the largest-ever covert U.S. operation.
Which unleashed the global jihad that blew back in America's face on 9/11.
Ten years later, the United States, as the above-referenced article makes clear, is still trying to ride the Islamist tiger without being eaten by it.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Friday, September 23, 2011
Thursday, September 22, 2011
EXPERT PREDICTS ECONOMIC ARMAGEDDON
Shocking Forbes Forecast: 'Financial Horror' Followed
by Rebuilding from the Bottom by the Fortunate Few
Click on the above, hyperlinked headline, read the article, and be scared, really scared, because the scenario makes perfect sense. The unthinkable is becoming more thinkable every day.
Europe's fall is likely to bring down the United States. But it doesn't have to be this way. Another, better world is possible--for Americans, at least.
The U.S. sits atop awesome, untapped natural resource wealth--proven and possible reserves of oil and gas, coal and shale, gold and silver, rare earth minerals. You name it, America's got it.
Development of the locked-up, choked-off resources would produce millions of well paying, permanent jobs (with benefits!) and make the world's greatest (but increasingly endangered) democracy the most prosperous nation on earth.
As the power elite prepares to shock the world economy into a clean slate, so to speak, in order remake the global financial system while profiting mightily from a historic, manmade catastrophe the old fashioned way--through plunder and piracy and the purchase of valuable assets, including whole industries, at fire-sale, bargain-basement prices--ordinary Americans and their so-called leaders should demand the immediate re-industrializing of their country based on aggressive, fair, environmentally sound exploitation of its true, neglected wealth--natural resources.
All that TV news and public affairs talk about retraining and re-educating for a new, "green" service economy is utter nonsense, misinformation or outright disinformation, in any case, a dangerous distraction for a critically injured patient--America--that is bleeding to death and in need of emergency care and long-term rehabilitation. The country's real wealth and real road to prosperity is hiding in plain sight, can be found by anyone with a decent Internet connection and an elementary school education. Sorry to have to tell you this, Tom Friedman, but America isn't Singapore. America is a big, rich country; and its real wealth is where it has always been--in the ground. Getting at that wealth--overcoming the job-killing, economy-crippling, middle class-crushing interests behind environmental extremism and global warming hysteria--should be Job One, along with decoupling the U.S. from the multilateral (and multicultural) madness that threatens its very existence.
After decades of bipartisan destruction and suffering caused by hollowing-out and outsourcing the U.S. economy in the name of saving the planet and lifting up the Third World, the time has at last come to move on ... dot USA ... towards a richer, stronger, truly independent United States.
Just 31% Have Favorable Opinion of UN: 2006 Poll
The UN has become synonymous with terrorism and tyranny, spying and stealing. That this monstrous organization, which threatens and undermines the sovereignty of the United States, is headquartered in New York City adds insult to injury.
The U.S. should get out of the UN and the UN should get out of the U.S. The 18 acres of East River-front Manhattan real estate presently providing a meeting place for murderers and thieves could be put to good public use. For example, the UN-occupied land could become the site of a great democracy museum and park.
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
IRAN'S MANIAC-IN-CHIEF THREATENS
The new Hitler isn't bluffing. Foreign Confidential™ analysts believe Iran intends to attack the United States with weapons of mass destruction in the event of an attack by either Israel or the U.S. on Iran's nuclear installations, and/or if the regime is threatened by a U.S.-supported, Arab Spring-style popular uprising,
Islamist Iran is close to being able to produce nuclear bombs and warheads, and has probably already produced several radiological weapons (dirty bombs) and biological weapons (using technology acquired from Communist Cuba).
'One Riot, One Ranger' - What a Difference
One Patriot Can Make Against an Evil Gang
Like a Texas Ranger Saving a Town from Outlaws,
Lone Star State Governor Comes to Israel's Rescue
As Israel's enemies gathered in glee at the United Nations, and America's apologist-in-chief, Barack Obama, prepared to appeal to the Islamist-led, international lynch mob, Republican Presidential candidate Rick Perry rode into New York. Like a hero in a Western movie or TV show, the Governor of Texas said this:
We are indignant that certain Middle Eastern leaders have discarded the principle of direct negotiations between the sovereign nation of Israel and the Palestinian leadership, and we are equally indignant that the Obama Administration’s Middle East policy of appeasement has encouraged such an ominous act of bad faith.Simply put, we would not be here today at the precipice of such a dangerous move if the Obama Policy in the Middle East wasn’t naïve, arrogant, misguided and dangerous.It must be said, first, that Israel is our oldest and strongest democratic ally in the Middle East and has been for more than 60 years. The Obama Policy of moral equivalency which gives equal standing to the grievances of Israelis and Palestinians, including the orchestrators of terrorism, is a dangerous insult.There is no middle ground between our allies and those who seek their destruction. America should not be ambivalent between the terrorist tactics of Hamas and the security tactics of the legitimate and free state of Israel. By proposing ‘indirect talks” through the U.S. rather than between Palestinian leaders and Israel, this administration encouraged the Palestinians to shun direct talks.Second, it was wrong for this Administration to suggest the 1967 borders should be the starting point for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. When you consider this suggestion was made on the eve of the Israeli Prime Minister’s visit, we see in this American Administration a willingness to isolate a close ally and to do so in a manner that is insulting and naïve.Third, by injecting the issue of 1967 borders in addition to a construction freeze in East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements, the Obama Administration has put Israel in a position of weakness and taken away their flexibility to offer concessions as part of the negotiation process.Indeed, bolstered by the Obama Administration’s policies and apologists at the U.N., the Palestinians are exploiting the instability in the Middle East hoping to achieve their objective without concessions or direct negotiations with Israel.
Read the whole speech here.
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011
SOLYNDRA SCAM STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN
Howard Rich is right on target about Obama's green energy scam. Click here to read his essay.
Wind and solar are scams, for the most part--inefficient, uneconomic, geographically limited alternative energy solutions that produce pathetically few jobs.
America's awesome ... real ... energy resources are untapped.
Enough new oil can be produced from old fields, using proven enhanced recovery methods, to make the United States energy independent.
Conventional new oil fields--the Bakken, for example--are truly huge and promising.
There are abundant natural gas reserves.
Why aren't these resources being developed?
Why no investment in natural gas pipelines?
Why no new oil refineries?
Why are Democrats bent on choking off energy supplies?
They are strangling the nation in the name of "saving the planet."
They are sacrificing America's economic well being and security for a global scam.
This much is clear: as the annual United Nations General Assembly gets underway, the safest place to be this week in New York City is UN headquarters.
Reason: even the wildest, craziest, most bloodthirsty and suicidal terrorists don't attack their own bases; and the UN, after all, is Terror Central, supreme sponsor of Radical Islam, Islamist terrorism and tyranny, murder and mayhem, despotism and destruction....
The time has come to get the UN out of the U.S. and the U.S. out of the UN.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Click here to read about an American hero and Medal of Honor recipient, Dakota L. Meyer.
The men he could not save were sitting ducks, annihilated by Islamist scum because of insane rules of engagement, because the American officers who did not order air support were prevented from doing so out of fear of being ... prosecuted ... for possibly striking the Afghan village that was harboring the clerical fascist Taliban.
That's the real, politically suppressed story--another story of our troops stabbed in the back by liberal idiots of appeasement and globalizing traitors.
Thomas L. Friedman, a leading and extremely effective propagandist for American job-destroying, American sovereignty-shredding globalization, today blasted Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin ("Bibi") Netanyahu for not giving into Palestinian demands, not agreeing to an Israeli withdrawal to pre-June 1967 boundaries (the infamous "Auschwitz lines" in the words of the late, distinctly dovish Israeli foreign minister, Abba Eban), not bowing to imperialist, Islamizing Turkey's neo-Ottoman ruler, etc. Click here for Friedman's vicious attack, which basically accuses Bibi and Israel's supporters of acting against U.S. interests.
Friedman asserts that U.S. President Barack Obama is a "friend" of Israel. Really? With friends like Obama....
Seriously, what Friedman and his fellow Democrats forget, is that Israel's true friends and supporters have access to televisions and radios, Internet-copnnected computers, smart phones and other mobile devices, newspapers and magazines. In other words, they can read, see, hear what Obama and his henchpersons are doing ... to promote political/organized Islam and to pressure and squeeze Israel.
Concerning an international obsession that is out of whack with the overall assault on the nation state....
Palestinian Arab nationalism, temporarily, at least, is the only acceptable nationalism in the eyes of the Obama administration and the American and European political elites--with the possible exception of Turkish nationalism.
What the two acceptable nationalisms have in common, of course, is Islamism, a global movement that the globalizing elites are cynically and stupidly (because it will blow back in their faces) trying to manipulate and exploit for political and economic reasons. Non-Arab Turkey is already ruled by an Islamist regime, albeit one that is hailed by Obama and Company as a "moderate" model. The planned new, irredentist Arab mini-state, which the foreign elites aim to sandwich in between a shrunken Israel and a shaky Kingdom of Jordan--nation states comprising the western and eastern banks of the Jordan River, respectively, in a land that was historically known as Palestine--is certain to be dominated by Islamists.
As shown by the phenomenal, post-Cold War rise of NATO, the bipartisan destruction of the once mighty American economy, the crushing and pauperizing of the American middle/working classes, and related developments, the nation state system is being attacked by powerful forces seeking to replace it with a kind of one-world corporate government. Hence, the hollowing out of the American economy--the outsourcing of its manufacturing sector by Republicans and Democrats alike--in the name of "global competitiveness."
The apparent, long-term objective is the establishment of a supreme, global holding company--a super-conglomerate controlling worldwide commerce, industries, energy--with the power to invade countries, create and confiscate wealth, jail and execute people across the planet, arm and disarm parts of the population, starve and enslave, etc.
There is no place in such a system for a truly sovereign America, truly sovereign European states, a Jewish State of any sort, regardless of size or shape. (Christianity and Judaism are also slated for extinction; but Islam is seen by the architects of the new global despotism as an inherently political, somehow pliable religion of much of the Third World.)
But don't be surprised if, here and there, to facilitate their diabolical plots and plans, mad schemes and dreams, the anti-nation state globalizers support the emergence of ... new nation states ... for the express purpose of dismembering old ones. Belgium and Italy could be pushed to fail and break apart in order to drive home certain, new world order economic lessons, for example. But the real push for country crack-ups will be in China and Russia, using Islamist separatist movements in both countries and Tibetan separatism in China.
Related Taboo Questions
Why wasn't NATO disbanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union?
Why didn't the Bush administration attempt to reconstitute America's World War II alliance with Russia and China after the (Pakistani/Iranian/Saudi-supported) Al Qaeda/Taliban Afghan Islamist attacks of 9/11?
Why, 10 years after the worst-ever attacks on the United States, hasn't there been a serious, bipartisan examination of the deadly, decades-old U.S. strategy of covertly and overtly supporting rightwing political Islam?
Why are America's awesome energy resources, including immense oil reserves that can be produced from old fields using proven and economically profitable (but perhaps not profitable enough for unpatriotic multinational behemoths) enhanced recovery methods, locked up in the name of "saving the planet?"
When it came to power and the whole country was in its grip, why didn't the most leftwing administration in American history propose the creation of a national oil company, one that could have produced millions of well paying, permanent jobs and at last made the dream of energy independence a reality by focusing on development of huge, neglected, domestic, onshore and offshore oil and gas resources (and maybe coal liquefaction, also) and instead opt for promoting inefficient, non-existent, non-job-creating "green alternatives" that have resulted in scandal and waste and a deeper dependency on overseas oil?
The answers to the above questions are not to be found in the traditional Left-Right divide. There is more to the choking-off of real American energy, Obama's odious outreach to organized/political Islam, and Bush's failure to swiftly and decisively defeat radical Islam--and his unnecessary invasion of Iraq--than meets the eye.
POSTSCRIPT: Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, John Huntsman, and other advocates of globalization are fond of telling Americans that "the economy has changed," as if by nature or an unavoidable historical process. In fact, the economy was changed--by Big Government and Big Business--in ways that have benefitted relative handfuls of Americans at the expense of the rest of the citizenry. Similarly, the global jihad didn't just happen; it was made to happen, unleashed by Washington, fueled and funded with American taxpayer money with the support of nuclear-armed Pakistan (a country with one organizing principle, Islam) and Saudi Arabia (an oil-rich tyranny with no civil or human rights). The Carter administration secretly assisted both the Islamist takeover of Iran and the Islamist revolt in Afghanistan--the latter intervention in order to lure the Soviets into invading the backward Muslim land and so hand Moscow its own, horribly costly, Vietnam-like quagmire--and the Reagan administration escalated this Cold War-era adventure in Great Gamesmanship into the largest-ever U.S. covert operation.
Copyright © 2011 Foreign Confidential™